Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Bribery, brothels, breaches of confidence: ATO officer loses appeal against imprisonment
spacer
Why Culture Matters (Even in Small Teams)
spacer
How to detect and prevent elder abuse when advising older clients: RSM
spacer
Div 296 must be considered ‘holistically’, IPA says
spacer
Working out your Work From Home (WFH) expenses – 2025 Rules
spacer
Accrued leave: take a holiday or take the payment?
spacer
Franchising and Leasing: Legal Issues to Consider When Securing a Location
spacer
Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
spacer
‘Results in paying more tax’: ATO warns Australians against early super access
spacer
Employee or Contractor ?
spacer
Inherited assets: what you need to know about pre-CGT v post-CGT investments
spacer
WHS and OHS Regulatory Update: August 2025
spacer
HECS/HELP debt reduction Bill introduced
spacer
Non deductibility of ATO interest charges for businesses
spacer
How safe is your business from scams
spacer
The biggest earthquakes in history : (1905–2025)
spacer
What Terms Should I Include in a Capital Raising Term Sheet?
spacer
Prepare for Div 296 now, accountants warn
spacer
ATO, lawmakers demand urgent action as GST fraud skyrockets
spacer
5 things smart businesses do to stop copycats
spacer
Do not trust myGov messages
spacer
Regulations have changed for buy now pay later services
spacer
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) warns about misinformation on super changes circulating online
spacer
The rise and fall of the world’s largest economies | GDP Epic Battle (1560–2025)
spacer
ATO hit list 2025 – Key Areas Under Review
spacer
Why Succession Planning Matters for Privately Owned and Wealth Groups in Australia
spacer
Benefits of a business plan
spacer
Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
spacer
Mixing business and pleasure? Be vigilant this tax season
spacer
30 June 2025 - Tax Checklist - Small (and Micro) Business
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2025
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2025
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 2 of, 2025 archive
spacer
ATO - Targeted Areas of Focus 2024-25
spacer
6 ways to improve your business plan
spacer
Benchmarks for small business
spacer
Beware the early lodgment tax trap, CPA Australia warns
spacer
Tax lawyer flags compliance traps with family trusts
spacer
Superannuation on paid parental leave from 1 July 2025
spacer
Tax Time Checklists Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
spacer
Comparison of various Animal Weights
spacer
2025 Tax Planning Guide Part 2
spacer
From 1 July 2025 ATO Interest is no longer tax deductible
spacer
SME confidence and conditions see uptick over Q1 2025, survey reveals
spacer
Depreciation expert urges property investors to leverage tax depreciation
spacer
Buy a business
spacer
Upskilling and self-education costs
spacer
How secure is your super account?
spacer
Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
spacer
Why Might a Lease Dispute Occur?
spacer
$20,000 instant asset write-off
spacer
2025 Tax Planning Guide Part 1
spacer
New Bunnings scam warning
spacer
The Largest Empires in the World's History
Bribery, brothels, breaches of confidence: ATO officer loses appeal against imprisonment

A former ATO client engagement officer has lost an appeal against a five-year prison sentence for accepting a $100,000 bribe in return for a favourable tax audit.

.

On 12 March 2024, former ATO client engagement officer Wenfeng Wei was sentenced to five years in prison after breaching the Commonwealth Criminal Code on multiple occasions.

He accepted bribes in return for favourable audits and illegally accessed restricted ATO data on associates’ competitors in what the courts described as a “gross abuse of trust.”

In May 2016, Wei was assigned to audit the taxation affairs of Raymond Schlemon and his company, Global World Group.

That August, Schlemon gave Wei a $100,000 cash bribe. In return, Wei undertook the audit in a way that “significantly favoured Shlemon,” assessing him for outstanding tax liabilities of $136,290, when the audit ought to have identified income tax and GST shortfalls of just over $6 million.

Wei, who also had a gambling addiction, laundered the money through casinos to provide an “ostensible source for the money,” court documents said.

He also accessed restricted ATO data concerning Shlemon in an unauthorised way more than 500 times between April 2017 and February 2022. He communicated with Shlemon before, during and after these ‘episodes’ of unauthorised access.

Wei engaged in similar activities relating to another associate, Chao Chang, who operated a brothel in Sydney’s Surry Hills known as The Ginza Club.

The former ATO officer accessed restricted government data relating to Chang and his business interests over 900 times between August 2017 and March 2020.

Furthermore, at the request of Chang, Wei accessed restricted ATO data on a competitor of Chang’s on 294 occasions. This included personal details, information regarding property transactions, shareholdings and tax returns of the competitor.

The judge described this conduct as “particularly concerning because of the breach of confidence in circumstances where [the competitor] was entitled to expect that a public organisation would protect her from competitors and the gross abuse of trust involved,” court documents read. 

"The offending involved a gross violation of [the competitor’s] privacy as well as of the ATO system.”

Wei was sentenced to five years in prison, with a non-parole period of two years and six months. The sentence commenced on 12 March 2024 and is set to expire on 11 March 2029.

The former ATO officer launched an appeal against his sentence, arguing that the sentencing judge had failed to consider his “contrition and remorse,” and his sentence should be reduced as he had pleaded guilty and co-operated with authorities.

Last Wednesday (24 September), the NSW Supreme Court rejected his appeal, finding that Wei’s cooperation had not warranted further reductions in his sentence, given that his early guilty plea had already resulted in a 25 per cent reduction in his sentence.

In fact, the judges said that they likely would have given him a stronger sentence, given the nature of his conduct.

“Were I to resentence, I too would impose a materially higher sentence for the bribery offence, even taking into account the evidence adduced on the usual basis against the possibility that this Court might resentence,” Justice Mark Leeming noted.

“That is because the offending was serious and sustained, and the errors identified by the applicant are relatively minor in terms of their impact on the process of formulating the appropriate sentence.”

 

 

 

 

 

Emma Partis
29 September 2025
accountantsdaily.com.au

Liability limited by a Scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
© O'Brien and Partners 2024 - All Rights Reserved | 333 Canterbury Road, Canterbury VIC 3126 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 Site by Acctweb