Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
spacer
Compare your business
spacer
2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 2)
spacer
ATO to crack down on rental income, WFH deductions this tax time
spacer
How to Draft a Standard Form Contract
spacer
GST, PAYG withholding a ‘significant portion’ of $50bn tax debt
spacer
ATO changes will make it harder for over 42,000 small businesses.
spacer
The Deadliest pandemics in History
spacer
Budget breakdown – Federal Government Analysis
spacer
Federal Budget 2024
spacer
Winners & Losers
spacer
2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 1)
spacer
Medicare levy surcharge OR basic health insurance ?
spacer
ATO warns of ‘serious penalties’ for unlawful tax scheme promoters
spacer
ACCC scam report
spacer
Employees taking more sick days - and it's getting worse
spacer
Foreign residents selling property in Australia
spacer
How much does negative gearing really cost – an overview and an opinion?
spacer
The Shortest-reigning Monarchs in History
spacer
FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
spacer
ATO’s debts on hold campaign prompts new IGTO guidance
spacer
A comprehensive collection of small business benchmarks
spacer
The 2025 Financial Year tax & super changes you need to know!
spacer
Underperforming employees: When can you terminate?
spacer
A comprehensive list of guides to industry specific tax deductions.
spacer
‘Renewed concerns’ about economy sees consumer sentiment dip: Westpac
spacer
Oldest Buildings in the World.
spacer
Small businesses may ‘collapse under strain of payday super’, IPA warns
spacer
ATO’s hands tied with scrapping on-hold debts, expert says
spacer
What Drives Your Business Growth and Profits?
spacer
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) shifting to firmer debt collection activity
spacer
Why employee v contractor comes down to fine print
spacer
Sharing economy reporting regime for platform operators
spacer
Vimeo test
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
How Do I Respond to an Allegation of Trade Mark Infringement?

Imagine you think up a fantastic name for your business and are ready to start operating. You have set up your website and begin advertising online using the business name and logo you have designed.

.

Everything is going great until you receive a letter claiming you have infringed on someone else’s trade mark. This article explores how you can respond to an allegation of trade mark infringement and the available defences.

Understanding the Allegation

If another business (or their lawyers) notifies you that your business’ name or logo infringes on their trade mark rights, it is essential to first assess whether the allegations are true. Once you understand what the registered trade mark owner is claiming, you can respond with a suitable reply that considers the defences available to you.

The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (TCA) sets out that if a name or logo is substantially identical or deceptively similar to an existing trade mark (and in relation to the same goods or services), it will amount to trade mark infringement. This is the case if the goods or services are the same or closely related.

You may also be infringing someone’s trade mark if it is well-known in Australia, even though it is registered for unrelated goods or services. Given the trade mark’s notoriety, an ordinary person could make a connection between the unrelated goods or services and the registered mark. 

An Example: Using a Well-Known Trade Mark

DC Comics v Cheqout Pty Ltd (2013) 212 FCR 194 (FCA) explains how using a well-known trade mark in bad faith will lead to infringement.  

Cheqout applied to register the name ‘superman workout’ in class 41 for exercise classes. DC Comics opposed the application because it has registered the name ‘Superman’ for various goods and services in Australia. They argued that ‘Superman’ is well-known in Australia. Consequently, it would confuse or deceive the public into thinking the ‘superman workouts’ were associated with the comic book character, ‘Superman’.

The Court stated that ‘Superman’ is undoubtedly a recognisable character. However, without a reference to the indicia of the character, there would be no confusion with the phrase ‘superman workouts’.

Cheqout had maintained that they were not associating the ‘superman workout’ with the ‘Superman’ character. However, evidence showed that Cheqout was using the ‘superman workouts’ phrase together with a shield device recognised as a ‘Superman’ symbol to relate to strength and fitness. As such, the indicia of DC Comics was used in association with the name, meaning Cheqout was using their trade mark in bad faith.

Recent Changes to the Law

It is important to remember that when determining whether two competing trade marks are deceptively similar, the Courts will no longer consider reputation or notoriety in an earlier mark to be a relevant consideration.

This new feature of trade mark infringement in Australia was established in early 2023 through the High Court decision of Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8. This case sets a new precedent establishing trade mark infringement in the marketplace. 

Defences to Allegations of Trade Mark Infringement

There are several defences available under the TCA, including using any of the following:

  • a person’s name in good faith (such as part of the name of a company);
  • the name of a person’s place of business in good faith;
  • the name in good faith to describe goods and services; or
  • a name for the purpose of comparative advertising.

If your defence is successful, you can continue using a certain name or logo, and it would not amount to trade mark infringement. 

An Example: Using Your Own Name

Optical 88 Limited v Optical 88 Pty Limited [2011] FCAFC 130 illustrates that you would not be infringing an already registered trade mark where the name you are using is your given name.

Optical 88 Limited is a company incorporated in Hong Kong (Optical 88 HK) with trade marks registered in Australia. It brought an action against Optical 88 Pty Ltd (Optical 88 AUS) for trade mark infringement.

Optical 88 AUS was able to rely on the defence that its use of the words ‘Optical 88’ to run its business was in good faith because it was using its own name.

Additionally, the Court clarified that acting in good faith involves considering whether:

  • it was an honest use of the trade mark;
  • there was intent to deceive the public into an association that doesn’t exist; and
  • the trade mark was trying to appropriate the goodwill that the other business had acquired.

If you believe your use of the registered trade mark was in good faith, you may have a valid defence to using the mark. It is important to speak to a trade mark lawyer to ensure that you respond with every possible available defence to you.

Commercial Considerations

When facing an allegation of trade mark infringement, you should consider whether engaging in a trade marks dispute to defend your position is worthwhile for your business. For instance, your business might be relatively new and are yet to acquire any goodwill or reputation with the public or in your industry. In that case, it may be worthwhile to change your business name or logo to one that is not infringing on someone else’s. This option would certainly be cheaper and less stressful than undergoing potential litigation. 

On the other hand, you may have grown attached to your business name or logo. Likewise, you may have spent considerable sums of money growing your business around your brand and developed a strong presence in your sector under that name. Accordingly, pursuing your case and trying to get a favourable outcome may be commercially sensible to protect your business and trade mark. 

Whether you are fighting your dispute in court or out, it is an expensive and personally taxing process that may still not provide you with a desirable outcome. You should weigh these commercial considerations before responding to an allegation of trade mark infringement.

Key Takeaways

Devising your business’ name and logo is a big part of starting a business. However, you may find yourself at the receiving end of a trade mark infringement notice. The first step is to understand the allegation and consider whether defences are available. It is best practice to speak to a qualified lawyer who can guide you through your options. 

 

 

 

 

Shannon Macdonald
September 8
legalvision.com.au

Liability limited by a Scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
© O'Brien and Partners 2022 - All Rights Reserved | 91 Station Street, Malvern VIC 3144 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 | Fax: 03 9509 3922. Site by Acctweb