Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Tips to help you this tax time
spacer
Tax Time Checklists Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
spacer
ATO warns millions of Australian chasing tax deductions to stop making 'unusual' claims
spacer
Impersonation scams are on the rise
spacer
Components of a cyber security plan
spacer
Social Security Payments and Their Effect on Discretionary Trusts
spacer
LRBA ban no better for housing supply or retirement, accountants clap back
spacer
The evolution of the world's languages
spacer
2026 Year-End Tax Planning Guide – Part 1
spacer
2026 Year-End Tax Planning Guide – Part 2
spacer
PAYDAY SUPER STARTS 1 JULY 2026 – Planning guides
spacer
Payday Super: 6 Things Small Businesses Need to Know
spacer
SMEs to be hit hardest by new trust tax reforms
spacer
6 tips to help businesses avoid financial difficulties
spacer
Managing your mental health and wellbeing during times of uncertainty
spacer
Check out what Uses the Most Internet Traffic: Data from 1994 to 2026
spacer
Key tax changes and measures from the 2026 Federal Budget
spacer
Federal budget 2026: Winners and losers
spacer
A breakdown of 2026-27 Federal Budget Themes and Papers.
spacer
ATO reminds practitioners to avoid common FBT mistakes
spacer
Why every business should have an AI policy
spacer
RSM welcomes updated PCG on transfer pricing for inbound distributors
spacer
Major super tax changes now law
spacer
ATO taking a closer look at investment properties
spacer
Choosing the right trustee structure for your SMSF
spacer
Succession planning and why it should be at the top of your to-do list
spacer
From Bricks to iPhones: The Evolution of the Telephone
spacer
Inflation continues to keep SME owners up at night, survey finds
spacer
Payday Super: 6 Things Small Businesses Need to Know
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2026
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2026
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2025
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2025
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2025
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Debate heats up around $10k cash ban bill

Concerns around a bill that will criminalise business cash payments above $10,000 continue to be raised as the industry waits on a parliamentary committee’s final report.

       

 

A total of 2,659 submissions were received by the Senate Economics Legislation Committee in the course of its inquiry into the Currency (Restrictions on the Use of Cash) Bill 2019, with the committee recently concluding its latest round of public hearings.

With the committee’s report due this Friday, the Australian Taxpayers’ Alliance has raised the temperature on the proposed measure, labelling it an “attack on economic freedom”.

“A $10,000 restriction on the use of cash would harm small businesses, give more power to corporate banks, and would fail to restrict any criminal activities,” said Australian Taxpayers’ Alliance policy director Emilie Dye.

“Many Australians still use cash and wish to continue using this legal tender for their privacy and security. Banks and electronic payment methods are not always reliable. Look at the bushfire crisis and the thousands of Australians forced to use cash during a natural disaster.”

The bill, which proposes to make it a criminal offence for businesses to make or accept a cash payment of $10,000 or more by introducing penalties of up to two years of imprisonment and a $25,200 fine for individuals, is currently before the Senate and was slated to come into effect from 1 January.

The Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman has also expressed its concerns with the bill, arguing that small businesses should not be disadvantaged in the marketplace where a customer chooses to pay with cash and the record keeping is compliant.

It also argues that regional and remote small businesses and pastoral family enterprises in rural Australia will be disadvantaged due to their lack of reliable access to internet and electronic banking facilities.

The major accounting bodies have been undecided on the measure, with some arguing that the law should not criminalise the use of legal tender, and others believing the cash ban should be extended to all payments.

In particular, CPA Australia has questioned the need to introduce criminal offences and penalties, noting that there are already a number of checks and balances in the system to address illegal activities where cash is involved.

“While we are aware that cash is an enabler of illegal activity, criminalising certain cash transactions in the manner proposed is an unnecessarily harsh response to the problem of avoiding scrutiny by the Commissioner of Taxation and other government agencies,” said CPA executive general manager Dr Gary Pflugrath in his submission to the committee.

“There has also been insufficient reasoning as to why criminal offences are seen as being the most appropriate solution or why the power to set exceptions should be delegated to the minister.

“We remain of the view the policy intent behind this bill would best be achieved by a mix of administrative penalties for breaches, but also incentives for business to move to electronic payment options.”

However, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ) believes there is merit in the measure, believing it will help level the playing field for small businesses, particularly in industries where cash transactions are common, including the building and construction industry, and motor vehicle sales and repairs.

“In a modern economy where the vast majority have access to, and regularly utilise, online payment arrangements, with cash usage in rapid decline, examples of situations where the cash payment limit will cause actual difficulty in day-to-day transactions are hard to find,” said CA ANZ tax leader Michael Croker.

“Yes, the measure is tough in terms of sanctions, but CA ANZ continues to agree with the simplicity and interoperability rationale for this measure — and the policy arguments more generally — which were articulated so well in the Final Report of the Black Economy Taskforce.”

 

 

Jotham Lian 
04 February 2020
accountantsdaily.com.au

 

 

 

Liability limited by a Scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
© O'Brien and Partners 2024 - All Rights Reserved | 333 Canterbury Road, Canterbury VIC 3126 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 Site by Acctweb