Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Bribery, brothels, breaches of confidence: ATO officer loses appeal against imprisonment
spacer
Why Culture Matters (Even in Small Teams)
spacer
How to detect and prevent elder abuse when advising older clients: RSM
spacer
Div 296 must be considered ‘holistically’, IPA says
spacer
Working out your Work From Home (WFH) expenses – 2025 Rules
spacer
Accrued leave: take a holiday or take the payment?
spacer
Franchising and Leasing: Legal Issues to Consider When Securing a Location
spacer
Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
spacer
‘Results in paying more tax’: ATO warns Australians against early super access
spacer
Employee or Contractor ?
spacer
Inherited assets: what you need to know about pre-CGT v post-CGT investments
spacer
WHS and OHS Regulatory Update: August 2025
spacer
HECS/HELP debt reduction Bill introduced
spacer
Non deductibility of ATO interest charges for businesses
spacer
How safe is your business from scams
spacer
The biggest earthquakes in history : (1905–2025)
spacer
What Terms Should I Include in a Capital Raising Term Sheet?
spacer
Prepare for Div 296 now, accountants warn
spacer
ATO, lawmakers demand urgent action as GST fraud skyrockets
spacer
5 things smart businesses do to stop copycats
spacer
Do not trust myGov messages
spacer
Regulations have changed for buy now pay later services
spacer
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) warns about misinformation on super changes circulating online
spacer
The rise and fall of the world’s largest economies | GDP Epic Battle (1560–2025)
spacer
ATO hit list 2025 – Key Areas Under Review
spacer
Why Succession Planning Matters for Privately Owned and Wealth Groups in Australia
spacer
Benefits of a business plan
spacer
Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
spacer
Mixing business and pleasure? Be vigilant this tax season
spacer
30 June 2025 - Tax Checklist - Small (and Micro) Business
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2025
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2025
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Debate heats up around $10k cash ban bill

Concerns around a bill that will criminalise business cash payments above $10,000 continue to be raised as the industry waits on a parliamentary committee’s final report.

       

 

A total of 2,659 submissions were received by the Senate Economics Legislation Committee in the course of its inquiry into the Currency (Restrictions on the Use of Cash) Bill 2019, with the committee recently concluding its latest round of public hearings.

With the committee’s report due this Friday, the Australian Taxpayers’ Alliance has raised the temperature on the proposed measure, labelling it an “attack on economic freedom”.

“A $10,000 restriction on the use of cash would harm small businesses, give more power to corporate banks, and would fail to restrict any criminal activities,” said Australian Taxpayers’ Alliance policy director Emilie Dye.

“Many Australians still use cash and wish to continue using this legal tender for their privacy and security. Banks and electronic payment methods are not always reliable. Look at the bushfire crisis and the thousands of Australians forced to use cash during a natural disaster.”

The bill, which proposes to make it a criminal offence for businesses to make or accept a cash payment of $10,000 or more by introducing penalties of up to two years of imprisonment and a $25,200 fine for individuals, is currently before the Senate and was slated to come into effect from 1 January.

The Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman has also expressed its concerns with the bill, arguing that small businesses should not be disadvantaged in the marketplace where a customer chooses to pay with cash and the record keeping is compliant.

It also argues that regional and remote small businesses and pastoral family enterprises in rural Australia will be disadvantaged due to their lack of reliable access to internet and electronic banking facilities.

The major accounting bodies have been undecided on the measure, with some arguing that the law should not criminalise the use of legal tender, and others believing the cash ban should be extended to all payments.

In particular, CPA Australia has questioned the need to introduce criminal offences and penalties, noting that there are already a number of checks and balances in the system to address illegal activities where cash is involved.

“While we are aware that cash is an enabler of illegal activity, criminalising certain cash transactions in the manner proposed is an unnecessarily harsh response to the problem of avoiding scrutiny by the Commissioner of Taxation and other government agencies,” said CPA executive general manager Dr Gary Pflugrath in his submission to the committee.

“There has also been insufficient reasoning as to why criminal offences are seen as being the most appropriate solution or why the power to set exceptions should be delegated to the minister.

“We remain of the view the policy intent behind this bill would best be achieved by a mix of administrative penalties for breaches, but also incentives for business to move to electronic payment options.”

However, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ) believes there is merit in the measure, believing it will help level the playing field for small businesses, particularly in industries where cash transactions are common, including the building and construction industry, and motor vehicle sales and repairs.

“In a modern economy where the vast majority have access to, and regularly utilise, online payment arrangements, with cash usage in rapid decline, examples of situations where the cash payment limit will cause actual difficulty in day-to-day transactions are hard to find,” said CA ANZ tax leader Michael Croker.

“Yes, the measure is tough in terms of sanctions, but CA ANZ continues to agree with the simplicity and interoperability rationale for this measure — and the policy arguments more generally — which were articulated so well in the Final Report of the Black Economy Taskforce.”

 

 

Jotham Lian 
04 February 2020
accountantsdaily.com.au

 

 

 

Liability limited by a Scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
© O'Brien and Partners 2024 - All Rights Reserved | 333 Canterbury Road, Canterbury VIC 3126 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 Site by Acctweb