Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Debate heats up around $10k cash ban bill
spacer
There’s still time to move to Single Touch Payroll (STP)
spacer
Real Time World Population Growth - Wow!!
spacer
ATO audits continue to target Lifestyle assets
spacer
Property deduction errors down to ‘lack of understanding’: ATO
spacer
Data can be great stuff! - Australia
spacer
GST refunds for returned imported goods
spacer
14k employers, $230m in super: Financial Services Minister defends proposed SG amnesty
spacer
Bushfires 2019–20 (ATO)
spacer
Accounting profession responds to bushfire crisis
spacer
Helping your business survive a natural disaster - ATO
spacer
Single Touch Payroll (STP) – now ensure super is paid on time.
spacer
Beware of Australian Taxation Office (ATO) impersonation scams
spacer
Australia by the Numbers
spacer
‘Visible, valued and owned’: ATO outlines super priorities for new year
spacer
Introductory Rates & Interest Free Periods
spacer
Our Advent calendar for 2019
spacer
Tax Office sounds warning on 8 types of super schemes
spacer
Don’t forget sharing economy income
spacer
Impress your friends with your knowledge!!
spacer
Salary sacrificing and the superannuation guarantee
spacer
Why so much super “stuff” this year?
spacer
Reverse Mortgage?
spacer
How the gig economy could create hidden tax issues for contractors and employers
spacer
15,000 tip-offs as ATO black economy hotline rings hot
spacer
What happens when interest rates hit the floor?
spacer
Director Penalty Notices (DPN)
spacer
Synchronised global economic slowdown
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 1 of, 2017 archive
spacer
Impending GST changes good news for SMEs
spacer
SMSF related-party borrowing arrangements
spacer
Primary Producer Income Tax Averaging
spacer
Active vs passive assets and the small business CGT concession
spacer
ATO issues further taxpayer alerts on key focus areas
spacer
Borrowed money to pay a business tax debt? Is the interest deductible?
spacer
Online Selling
spacer
The dangers of income splitting
spacer
Clients failing on depreciation front - property investment
spacer
Home office deductions: What substantiation will the ATO accept?
spacer
ATO advises accountants on client data swoop
spacer
ATO issues stern reminder on new backpacker tax
spacer
Debt Recovery
spacer
Government takes next step in tax cheats crackdown
spacer
Car salary packages and the deductibility of after-tax running costs
spacer
Choosing an Executor
spacer
ATO fires warning shots at cash economy exploiters
spacer
Getting a tax valuation from the ATO
spacer
5 tips to get home office deductions right
Active vs passive assets and the small business CGT concession

 

The small business capital gains tax concessions are extremely valuable, and for small business owners who need to dispose of assets that have risen in value during the time they have owned them, accessing these concessions can mean greatly reducing any consequent tax liability, even to zero.

       

 

But to access the CGT concessions some conditions must first be satisfied, such as having an aggregated annual turnover of less then $2 million, and net assets not exceeding $6 million. One of the small business CGT concessions, the 50% asset reduction, comes with one particular condition — that the CGT asset satisfies the active asset test. 

A CGT asset is an “active asset” if it is used, or held ready for use, in the course of carrying on a business by the taxpayer (or their affiliate or an entity connected with them, known as relevant entities). For example, a bricks-and-mortar shop held and used by a green grocer to sell fruit and vegetables is an example of an active asset. 

Another condition to satisfy this test is that the asset must be an active asset of the taxpayer for the lesser of 7.5 years or half of the relevant ownership period.

However, certain assets are specifically excluded from being an active asset, with one such exclusion applying to assets where the main use by the taxpayer is to derive rent (unless the main use for deriving rent was only temporary). When determining the main use of the asset, the taxpayer is instructed to disregard any personal use or enjoyment of the asset by them (which includes use by affiliates and connected entities). 

Carrying on a business

To qualify as an active asset, a tangible CGT asset must be used or held ready for use in the course of carrying on a business, but there is no black-and-white test for determining whether a business is being carried on. However the ATO has enumerated several indicators that may be relevant, including;

  • the size, scale and permanency of the activity
  • repetition and regularity of the activity 
  • whether the activity is planned, organised and carried on in a systematic and businesslike manner, and
  • the expectation, and likelihood, of a profit.

It can be assumed that the operator of a motel is conducting a business, however most residential rental activities are a form of investment, and do not amount to carrying on a business. 

Notwithstanding this, it is possible to conduct a rental property business. To take a real example from the ATO’s case files, it so happened that a taxpayer owned eight houses and three apartment blocks (each comprising six residential units), making a total of 26 properties. The taxpayer actively managed the properties, devoting a significant amount of time to this (an average of 25 hours per week). The ATO concluded this taxpayer was carrying on a business. 

So while an asset whose main use is “to derive rent” cannot be an active asset, it has been argued that this exception should not apply to properties where the taxpayer carries on a business of leasing properties (but rather only to passive investments). There have however been legal cases where the courts rejected this argument, stating clearly that it does not matter if the taxpayer is in the business of leasing properties or not. 

There is no statutory definition of the word rent that is relevant in this context, so the term takes on its common law meaning. 

Where there is a question of whether the amount paid constitutes “rent”, a key factor to consider is whether the occupier has a right to “exclusive possession” of the property. If such a right exists, the payments involved are likely to be rent. Conversely, if the arrangement allows the occupier only to enter and use the premises for certain purposes, and does not amount to a lease granting exclusive possession, the payments involved are unlikely to be rent. 

Other relevant factors include the degree of control retained by the owner, the extent of any services performed by the owner (such as room cleaning, provision of meals, supply of linen and shared amenities) and the length of the arrangement. 

By way of example, the ATO looked at the operator an eight-bedroom boarding house. The average length of stay was four to six weeks. Visitors were required to leave the premises by a certain time and the proprietor retains the right to enter the rooms. He pays for all utilities and provides cleaning and maintenance, linen and towels and common areas such as a lounge room, kitchen and recreation area. The ATO concluded that the amounts received were not rent. 

What is main use?

The term “main use” is not defined in the relevant laws. Therefore resolving the matter in regard to the mixed use of assets is likely to involve a consideration of various factors, however most important will be the comparative level of income derived from the different uses of the asset.

By way of example, consider a taxpayer who owns land on which there are several industrial sheds. He uses one shed (45% of the land area) to conduct a motorcycle repair business and leases the other sheds (55% of the land by area) to unrelated third parties. The income derived from the repair business is 80% of total income, with the rest derived from leasing the other sheds. Having regard to all the circumstances, the ATO considered that the “main use” of the taxpayer’s land is not to derive rent. 


Tax & Super Australia 
www.taxandsuperaustralia.com.au

© O'Brien and Partners 2011 - All Rights Reserved | 91 Station Street, Malvern VIC 3144 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 | Fax: 03 9509 3922