Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
spacer
Compare your business
spacer
2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 2)
spacer
ATO to crack down on rental income, WFH deductions this tax time
spacer
How to Draft a Standard Form Contract
spacer
GST, PAYG withholding a ‘significant portion’ of $50bn tax debt
spacer
ATO changes will make it harder for over 42,000 small businesses.
spacer
The Deadliest pandemics in History
spacer
Budget breakdown – Federal Government Analysis
spacer
Federal Budget 2024
spacer
Winners & Losers
spacer
2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 1)
spacer
Medicare levy surcharge OR basic health insurance ?
spacer
ATO warns of ‘serious penalties’ for unlawful tax scheme promoters
spacer
ACCC scam report
spacer
Employees taking more sick days - and it's getting worse
spacer
Foreign residents selling property in Australia
spacer
How much does negative gearing really cost – an overview and an opinion?
spacer
The Shortest-reigning Monarchs in History
spacer
FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
spacer
ATO’s debts on hold campaign prompts new IGTO guidance
spacer
A comprehensive collection of small business benchmarks
spacer
The 2025 Financial Year tax & super changes you need to know!
spacer
Underperforming employees: When can you terminate?
spacer
A comprehensive list of guides to industry specific tax deductions.
spacer
‘Renewed concerns’ about economy sees consumer sentiment dip: Westpac
spacer
Oldest Buildings in the World.
spacer
Small businesses may ‘collapse under strain of payday super’, IPA warns
spacer
ATO’s hands tied with scrapping on-hold debts, expert says
spacer
What Drives Your Business Growth and Profits?
spacer
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) shifting to firmer debt collection activity
spacer
Why employee v contractor comes down to fine print
spacer
Sharing economy reporting regime for platform operators
spacer
Vimeo test
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Superannuation and independent contractors: fresh Full Federal Court guidance

 

In February 2022, the High Court handed down a landmark decision in ZG Operations v Jamsek, which clarified the test for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor.

 

 

The High Court remitted the question of whether the workers were “employees” under the extended definition of that term in s 12(3) of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (the SGA Act) back to the Full Federal Court.

In deciding that the relevant workers were not “employees” under the extended definition in s 12(3), the Full Federal Court determined that s 12(3) does not apply to an independent contractor relationship where the worker uses a company, trust or other service vehicle to contract with the putative employer instead of doing so in their personal capacity. This confirms the ATO’s guidance in Superannuation Guarantee Ruling SGR 2005/1.

Additionally, in determining whether a worker is an “employee” under the extended definition in s 12(3), the Full Federal Court has confirmed that a worker will not be taken to work under a contract that is “wholly or principally for [their] labour” in the following circumstances.

Finding

Comment

The contract is for labour and non-labour (eg the provision of substantial capital assets or the assumption of risk) components, and based on a quantitative valuation, the non-labour components predominate.

In many independent contractor relationships, the contractor may be required to provide their own tools and equipment. Whether the contract is principally for labour or alternatively the provision of capital assets and the assumption of material risks is likely to turn on a valuation of the labour and non-labour components respectively.

The worker has the ability to delegate the performance of work under the contract to other persons.

The party that bears the onus of proof will need to substantiate the value of the labour and non-labour components through evidence.

The worker is engaged under a contract for a “result”.

This finding is consistent with previous case law and ATO guidance. The workers had a contractual right of delegation in this case.

 

Employers are required to provide their employees with a minimum level of superannuation support (currently 10.5%) each quarter, otherwise the employer will become liable to pay the superannuation guarantee charge. An “employee” for these purposes includes an employee at common law.

The SGA Act also includes a number of provisions which extend the meaning of “employee”. Relevantly, s 12(3) of the SGA extends the meaning of “employee”, so that: “If a person works under a contract that is wholly or principally for the labour of the person, the person is an employee of the other party to the contract.”

This provision is broad and captures many independent contractor relationships. An entity that engages an independent contractor under a contract of this nature is required to provide the contractor with superannuation support (otherwise they will become liable to pay the superannuation guarantee charge).

Whilst there is nothing new about these conclusions at such a high judicial level, this is a prudent time to review independent contractor relationships.

Expansion of the superannuation net is inevitable.

 

 

AcctWeb

Liability limited by a Scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
© O'Brien and Partners 2022 - All Rights Reserved | 91 Station Street, Malvern VIC 3144 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 | Fax: 03 9509 3922. Site by Acctweb