Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
COVID-19 resources -Update July 2020
spacer
JobKeeper Phase 2 - The Next Step
spacer
Payroll Tax 2020 concessions and JobKeeper
spacer
Work Related expenses – 2020
spacer
‘Everyone is now on notice’: ATO acquires COVID-19 data on 3m Aussies
spacer
Extra Tools & Resources for our clients.
spacer
Year End Tax Deductions – “equipment”
spacer
Home Office Claims 2020
spacer
Early release of super sees ‘high take-up’
spacer
Tax time 2020: ATO homes in on rental deduction claims
spacer
ATO announces Div 7A COVID-19 assistance
spacer
‘HomeBuilder’ grants now available.
spacer
$150k instant asset write-off extended for 6 months
spacer
Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
spacer
JobKeeper documentation ‘absolutely critical’ in ATO audit
spacer
ATO updates JobKeeper compliance approach
spacer
COVID-19 hotspots - tax time 2020
spacer
Tax reform to feature heavily in PM’s JobMaker plan
spacer
Jobkeeper Fraud warning
spacer
ATO extends initial JobKeeper payment deadline
spacer
Boosting cash flow - ATO
spacer
Our website, your resources
spacer
ATO releases JobKeeper alternative test
spacer
Temporary Working from Home Expenses Rule
spacer
Minimum Pensions Halved – 2020 & 2021
spacer
More coronavirus support for landlords, commercial tenants
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 1 of, 2017 archive
spacer
Impending GST changes good news for SMEs
spacer
SMSF related-party borrowing arrangements
spacer
Primary Producer Income Tax Averaging
spacer
Active vs passive assets and the small business CGT concession
spacer
ATO issues further taxpayer alerts on key focus areas
spacer
Borrowed money to pay a business tax debt? Is the interest deductible?
spacer
Online Selling
spacer
The dangers of income splitting
spacer
Clients failing on depreciation front - property investment
spacer
Home office deductions: What substantiation will the ATO accept?
spacer
ATO advises accountants on client data swoop
spacer
ATO issues stern reminder on new backpacker tax
spacer
Debt Recovery
spacer
Government takes next step in tax cheats crackdown
spacer
Car salary packages and the deductibility of after-tax running costs
spacer
Choosing an Executor
spacer
ATO fires warning shots at cash economy exploiters
spacer
Getting a tax valuation from the ATO
spacer
5 tips to get home office deductions right
The dangers of income splitting

 

Now and then the ATO issues warnings on how its general anti-avoidance legislation can apply to professional firms that allocate profits to individual professional practitioners with proprietorship in the firm.

       

 

Firms potentially affected include those providing services in the accounting, architectural, engineering, financial services, legal and medical professions.

Professional firms can be structured in a range of ways, depending on the choices made by the owners, but the ATO has warned that in some cases the way a business is structured “can be used in ways that give rise to different tax consequences and resulting tax compliance risks”. 

Its concerns about tax compliance in these instances are based on where arrangements are set up so that a practice’s income is treated as being derived from the business itself, even though the source of that income is actually the provision of professional services by individuals.

The ATO says this is particularly the case where: 

  • the level of income received by the practitioner, whether by way of salary, distribution of partnership or trust profit, dividend or any combination of them, does not reflect their contribution to the business and is not otherwise explicable by the commercial circumstances of the business
  • tax paid by the practitioner and/or associated entities on profits of the practice entity is less than that which would have been paid if the amounts were assessed in the hands of the practitioner directly
  • the practitioner is, in substance, being remunerated through arrangements with their associates, and
  • the structure does not provide the practitioner with advantages, such as limited liability or asset protection.

The danger here is that the ATO may commence compliance activity, including audits, of practitioners for any given income year. The ATO’s approach could include: 

  • an individual professional practitioner provides professional services to clients of the firm, or is actively involved in the management of the firm and, in either case, the practitioner and/or associated entities have a legal or beneficial interest in the firm
  • the firm operates by way of a legally effective partnership, trust or company, and
  • the income of the firm is not personal services income.

High and low risk

The ATO says taxpayers will be rated as low risk and not subject to compliance action if they meet one of the following guidelines regarding income from the firm (including salary, partnership or trust distributions, distributions from service entities or dividends from associated entities): 

  • the practitioner receives assessable income from the firm in their own hands as an appropriate return for the services they provide to the firm. The benchmark for an appropriate level of income will be the remuneration paid to the highest band of professional employees providing equivalent services to the firm, or to a comparable firm
  • 50% or more of the income to which the practitioner and their associated entities are collectively entitled (whether directly or indirectly through interposed entities) in the relevant year is assessable in the hands of the practitioner
  • the practitioner, and their associated entities, both have an effective tax rate of 30% or higher on the income received from the firm.

Where none of these guidelines are satisfied, the ATO says the practitioner’s arrangement will be considered higher risk, with increased chance of compliance action. The lower the effective tax rate of an arrangement, the higher the ATO may rank the compliance risk.


Tax & Super Australia 
www.taxandsuperaustralia.com.au

 

 

© O'Brien and Partners 2011 - All Rights Reserved | 91 Station Street, Malvern VIC 3144 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 | Fax: 03 9509 3922