Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
15,000 tip-offs as ATO black economy hotline rings hot
spacer
What happens when interest rates hit the floor?
spacer
Director Penalty Notices (DPN)
spacer
Synchronised global economic slowdown
spacer
STP to be increasingly monitored
spacer
6 new accounting related videos
spacer
GDP by country since 1800
spacer
Information needed to be the BBQ expert.
spacer
Employee or independent contractor: What happens when it goes wrong?
spacer
Single Touch Payroll (STP) reporting irregularities: ATO contacting businesses
spacer
Employee entitlements, ‘wage theft’ and Fair Work: Why it’s time to be proactive
spacer
How's Australia really doing - the real figures?
spacer
Pension deeming rates cut from 1 July 2019
spacer
Audit warning sounded as ATO clamps down on dodgy claims
spacer
New ATO data-matching program – overseas movement data and HELP debt
spacer
ATO black economy strike force heads to Brisbane
spacer
Access to more resources and tools than most websites.
spacer
Tax Return Mistakes
spacer
SMSF advice appetite strong, says ASIC
spacer
Taxpayers confused by Scott Morrison’s $1,080 tax refund
spacer
Common STP set-up mistakes - ATO
spacer
Proposal to hold directors liable for GST set to pierce corporate veil
spacer
September 2019 - vital statistics for Australia
spacer
Tax Commissioner wants to turn black economy to ‘lighter shade of grey’
spacer
Changes to the Private Health Insurance Statement
spacer
Up to 9 in 10 ‘other’ expenses adjusted as ATO reveals dodgy claims
spacer
Downsizer Super Contribution
spacer
Tax payers to receive beefed up tax returns.
spacer
10 top global corporations since 1998
spacer
Catch-up Contributions
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 1 of, 2017 archive
spacer
Impending GST changes good news for SMEs
spacer
SMSF related-party borrowing arrangements
spacer
Primary Producer Income Tax Averaging
spacer
Active vs passive assets and the small business CGT concession
spacer
ATO issues further taxpayer alerts on key focus areas
spacer
Borrowed money to pay a business tax debt? Is the interest deductible?
spacer
Online Selling
spacer
The dangers of income splitting
spacer
Clients failing on depreciation front - property investment
spacer
Home office deductions: What substantiation will the ATO accept?
spacer
ATO advises accountants on client data swoop
spacer
ATO issues stern reminder on new backpacker tax
spacer
Debt Recovery
spacer
Government takes next step in tax cheats crackdown
spacer
Car salary packages and the deductibility of after-tax running costs
spacer
Choosing an Executor
spacer
ATO fires warning shots at cash economy exploiters
spacer
Getting a tax valuation from the ATO
spacer
5 tips to get home office deductions right
The dangers of income splitting

 

Now and then the ATO issues warnings on how its general anti-avoidance legislation can apply to professional firms that allocate profits to individual professional practitioners with proprietorship in the firm.

       

 

Firms potentially affected include those providing services in the accounting, architectural, engineering, financial services, legal and medical professions.

Professional firms can be structured in a range of ways, depending on the choices made by the owners, but the ATO has warned that in some cases the way a business is structured “can be used in ways that give rise to different tax consequences and resulting tax compliance risks”. 

Its concerns about tax compliance in these instances are based on where arrangements are set up so that a practice’s income is treated as being derived from the business itself, even though the source of that income is actually the provision of professional services by individuals.

The ATO says this is particularly the case where: 

  • the level of income received by the practitioner, whether by way of salary, distribution of partnership or trust profit, dividend or any combination of them, does not reflect their contribution to the business and is not otherwise explicable by the commercial circumstances of the business
  • tax paid by the practitioner and/or associated entities on profits of the practice entity is less than that which would have been paid if the amounts were assessed in the hands of the practitioner directly
  • the practitioner is, in substance, being remunerated through arrangements with their associates, and
  • the structure does not provide the practitioner with advantages, such as limited liability or asset protection.

The danger here is that the ATO may commence compliance activity, including audits, of practitioners for any given income year. The ATO’s approach could include: 

  • an individual professional practitioner provides professional services to clients of the firm, or is actively involved in the management of the firm and, in either case, the practitioner and/or associated entities have a legal or beneficial interest in the firm
  • the firm operates by way of a legally effective partnership, trust or company, and
  • the income of the firm is not personal services income.

High and low risk

The ATO says taxpayers will be rated as low risk and not subject to compliance action if they meet one of the following guidelines regarding income from the firm (including salary, partnership or trust distributions, distributions from service entities or dividends from associated entities): 

  • the practitioner receives assessable income from the firm in their own hands as an appropriate return for the services they provide to the firm. The benchmark for an appropriate level of income will be the remuneration paid to the highest band of professional employees providing equivalent services to the firm, or to a comparable firm
  • 50% or more of the income to which the practitioner and their associated entities are collectively entitled (whether directly or indirectly through interposed entities) in the relevant year is assessable in the hands of the practitioner
  • the practitioner, and their associated entities, both have an effective tax rate of 30% or higher on the income received from the firm.

Where none of these guidelines are satisfied, the ATO says the practitioner’s arrangement will be considered higher risk, with increased chance of compliance action. The lower the effective tax rate of an arrangement, the higher the ATO may rank the compliance risk.


Tax & Super Australia 
www.taxandsuperaustralia.com.au

 

 

© O'Brien and Partners 2011 - All Rights Reserved | 91 Station Street, Malvern VIC 3144 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 | Fax: 03 9509 3922