Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Debate heats up around $10k cash ban bill
spacer
There’s still time to move to Single Touch Payroll (STP)
spacer
Real Time World Population Growth - Wow!!
spacer
ATO audits continue to target Lifestyle assets
spacer
Property deduction errors down to ‘lack of understanding’: ATO
spacer
Data can be great stuff! - Australia
spacer
GST refunds for returned imported goods
spacer
14k employers, $230m in super: Financial Services Minister defends proposed SG amnesty
spacer
Bushfires 2019–20 (ATO)
spacer
Accounting profession responds to bushfire crisis
spacer
Helping your business survive a natural disaster - ATO
spacer
Single Touch Payroll (STP) – now ensure super is paid on time.
spacer
Beware of Australian Taxation Office (ATO) impersonation scams
spacer
Australia by the Numbers
spacer
‘Visible, valued and owned’: ATO outlines super priorities for new year
spacer
Introductory Rates & Interest Free Periods
spacer
Our Advent calendar for 2019
spacer
Tax Office sounds warning on 8 types of super schemes
spacer
Don’t forget sharing economy income
spacer
Impress your friends with your knowledge!!
spacer
Salary sacrificing and the superannuation guarantee
spacer
Why so much super “stuff” this year?
spacer
Reverse Mortgage?
spacer
How the gig economy could create hidden tax issues for contractors and employers
spacer
15,000 tip-offs as ATO black economy hotline rings hot
spacer
What happens when interest rates hit the floor?
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 4 of, 2016 archive
spacer
Big-ticket tax set for government review
spacer
FBT – Christmas Parties and Taxi Fares
spacer
Unclaimed Monies - Christmas Project?
spacer
Employee Christmas Parties and Gifts – Any FBT?
spacer
‘Beware the tax man’ eyeing holiday period activity
spacer
Merry Christmas for 2016, a Happy New Year and a prosperous 2017.
spacer
Research reveals key to ‘high-performing’ firms
spacer
Late payments hitting SMEs hard
spacer
Estate planning issues flagged with $1.6m pension transfer cap
spacer
New fleet “safe harbour” approach for car fringe benefits
spacer
Travel to a workplace: What’s in, what’s out
spacer
Struggling Business Turnarounds
spacer
SMSF practitioners told to urgently address TRIS issues
spacer
$20,000 write off is only available for small business, right? Well…
spacer
Do you need an Employment Agreement?
spacer
What does the new withholding tax mean for your clients?
spacer
Domestic (non-marital) Relationships
spacer
Is there a problem with using your company’s assets for yourself?
spacer
SMEs at risk of ‘falling foul’ of ATO
spacer
Scams, fraudsters and viruses
spacer
Got your car log book ready?
‘Beware the tax man’ eyeing holiday period activity

 

The ATO is poised to home in on fringe benefits tax (FBT) on celebrations and gifts this festive season, according to one mid-tier firm.

       

 

Depending on where a Christmas party is held, how much is spent on each guest, and whether gifts count as entertainment, FBT may be applicable, said Mariana von-Lucken, tax partner at HLB Mann Judd Sydney.

“Businesses should keep in mind that there are two main methods for reporting FBT, the ‘actual’ and the ’50-50’ split method, and understanding how each of these work can help minimise the FBT liability,” she said.

“With the 50-50 method, FBT exemptions generally do not apply, regardless of the cost of any entertainment, so as a general rule, businesses are better off using the ‘actual’ method if entertainment expenses are likely to be under $300 a head,” she said.

Ms von-Lucken stressed the importance of keeping accurate records, adding that while the 50-50 split method usually requires less record-keeping, it can mean more FBT needs to be paid.

“It will depend on who is being entertained – clients or staff. If more staff attend, then the 50-50 method may help reduce the FBT liability,” she said.

“The 50-50 method basically means that FBT is payable on 50 per cent of the expense of providing meal entertainment to all guests, whether staff, clients or family.

“The actual method, on the other hand, means FBT is paid on all expenses for staff, but if any clients attend the event then there is no FBT payable on their expenses. Keep in mind that the client portion is not tax deductible and employers are not able to claim the GST in their business activity statements.

“Generally, using the actual method to report liabilities tends to ensure a lesser FBT liability; however it is important accurate records are kept to verify claims.

“Also, the method chosen applies for the entire FBT year, not per event, although for many businesses a Christmas party is the sole event they host for the year.”

Using business premises for a Christmas party is a fairly safe bet, however.

If the party is held on the business’ premises, on a normal working day, with just employees attending, there will be no FBT liability as long as the actual method of reporting is used, said Ms von-Lucken.

“There is also no limit on the amount that can be spent, and this includes expenses such as taxi fares for employees to get home after the party,” Ms von-Lucken said.

“If other people attend the party, such as spouses, the total cost per person must be less than $300 (including GST) to remain FBT-exempt.

“If the 50-50 method is used, then 50 per cent of all expenses will be subject to FBT regardless of how much or little is spent per guest. However, a GST credit is claimable for 50 per cent of the GST-inclusive cost of the food and drink, and a deduction is available for 50 per cent of the GST-inclusive cost, less any GST credit claimable.”

Further, if the party is held off the business premises, it will still be exempt from FBT if the cost per head is less than $300 as long as the actual method is used. No tax deduction is available or GST credits claimable in this instance.


KATARINA TAURIAN
Wednesday 20 November 2016
accountantsdaily.com.au

© O'Brien and Partners 2011 - All Rights Reserved | 91 Station Street, Malvern VIC 3144 | Tel: 03 9509 3911 | Fax: 03 9509 3922